Uncensored Investigative Journalism

Subscribe with RSS Subscribe with RSS


Get notified of the latest articles, podcast and press releases

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up! 

Pfizer’s Experimental Covid-19 Vaccine—What You’re Not Being Told

Pfizer’s long history of scandals, and the fact that they have never been held to account for their crimes, continues to be ignored by the media, even as its experimental mRNA vaccine candidate for Covid-19 draws ever closer to US government approval.

The vaccine information war has kicked up a gear, and the mainstream media vultures are circling to descend on any content that they can easily label and dismiss as misinformation. Laws will be passed throughout legislatures globally to criminalise anyone who publicly misunderstands any part of the complex biological processes involved in many of the new experimental vaccine technologies that are being used to produce Covid-19 vaccine candidates.

Even now, intelligence agencies and intelligence-backed tech companies are set to deploy sophisticated methods to censor content and deplatform news websites that they view as promoting ‘vaccine hesitancy’ as well as ‘vaccine misinformation’, particularly as a Covid-19 vaccine candidate lurches closer to approval.

It is expected that by month’s end the mRNA vaccine produced by the scandal-ridden pharmaceutical giant Pfizer will be approved by the US government via an emergency-use authorization, with other countries expected to follow suit. Pfizer, in anticipation of the seemingly imminent and assured approval of their vaccine candidate, has already been manufacturing hundreds of millions of doses of its vaccine for weeks and has received praise from governments and mainstream media alike for its self-reported claims that its vaccine is 90 percent effective.

In particular, the success of the experimental mRNA mass vaccination program appears to hinge on the general population being unable to effectively articulate their concerns and objections. Whilst the mainstream media are quick to point out when somebody makes an error in how they believe the mRNA vaccine works, they don’t offer any further information than the official government line. Public distrust in vaccination programs is not the fault of those who don’t understand the way this brand-new technology works. Public distrust is all-pervasive because only one side of the argument is allowed to be heard. We do need to understand the technology involved, as there is a difference between mRNA vaccines and DNA vaccines. Having a general understanding of the reason why someone should object to being given an experimental mRNA vaccine is necessary for creating a clear and coherent argument.

We are about to examine a subject that has been one of the most censored topics in the modern era. But now, more than ever before, we are in desperate need of the information that is being systematically hidden from the public. This article will be banned and attacked by those who believe we, the general public, shouldn’t know all the information about what they want to achieve from the coming mass global vaccinations. The reason for the current establishment’s unwillingness to speak about this subject leads to perhaps unnecessary suspicion. Such suspicions will never be dismissed via the currently employed tactic of smearing anyone who questions intentions. If governments worldwide want their populations to submit to these vaccinations, then they need to stop patronising people and speak honestly. However, since that is unheard of, they will continue to employ coercive tactics, as they will be trying out a never-before-approved experimental method to boost the immune system by manipulating the process our DNA uses to signal for the creation of certain proteins, and we have little idea of what the long-term impact this brand-new therapeutic technology could have on our health. No politician, medical expert, or pharmaceutical representative is willing to accept responsibility for challenges that might be around the corner.

Many of the pharmaceutical companies researching potential coronavirus vaccines are using old methods. They take a proverbial pinch of the virus and infect your immune system at a very low and slow rate, allowing your body the time it needs to build up a natural immunological resistance to the illness. But developing those types of vaccines is a slow and arduous process, and the current leaders in the race to mass global vaccination are pharmaceutical companies using a radical new method that has never been tried before.

‘They are going to hack the cells in your body in order to make them into drug factories’, says Nathan Vardi, a staff writer for Forbes, in a video titled Why Pfizer Is Betting Big on an Unproven Treatment for Covid-19, from March 2020. ‘The problem is with this approach’, Vardi admits, ‘is there’s never been an approved mRNA product’.

The various scientific explorations into the therapeutic applications of potential mRNA treatments are still in their infancy, but the method has been lauded as a potential solution to the treatment of cancer and infectious diseases, for protein replacement, and for gene therapy.

In January 2020, the de facto leader in the mRNA field was the pharmaceutical company Moderna, but—in the wake of Covid-19—other major companies began to focus on the mRNA method. Moderna was able to pioneer that method several years ago, thanks to funding largely provided by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Now, as 2020 draws to a close, the race to develop the winning Covid-19 vaccine is in full swing, and another Big Pharma company has seemingly beaten Moderna to the development of a supposedly effective mRNA vaccine, thanks to Pfizer teaming up with BioNTech, a small German company, to pip Moderna to the post. But, in this race to ‘save humanity’, there are bound to be pitfalls, especially when introducing completely new health technologies into mainstream use. Has Pfizer rung the finishing bell in this global race to end the current pandemic, or, instead, is it hurtling towards a disaster of epic proportions?

There are very informative scientific papers available from just before the pandemic began that give us an insight into this new mRNA technology. So here I’ll examine the DNA manipulating method, the vaccine, the people behind the research and development at BioNTech, but most important, I’ll examine Pfizer, and look at how the company has avoided accountability when things go wrong—and things do go wrong at Pfizer.

mRNA Vaccine Technology and How It Works

The vital interaction that mRNA has with our DNA has made selling mRNA vaccine technology extremely difficult for those who believe it’s the future of human medicine. The fact that it will alter the function of your DNA in your body has made many people suspicious of what unexpected horrors could arise through mass use of this new and experimental technique.

Unsurprisingly, the people marketing the vaccines have tried to downplay the aggressive and genetically manipulative nature of the treatment. In fairness, trying to explain the workings of such a complex new technology in plain English is exceedingly difficult. This is apparent when one listens to representatives of the mainstream media, who are often mealy mouthed when describing the biological processes that will take place when you receive the mRNA vaccine. But inability to articulate the technology isn’t surprising when you consider that part of your DNA, after breaking in two through a natural process, will then be combined with the experimental mRNA in a way that seems esoteric to many of us. It’s almost impossible to imagine such a process taking place in one’s own vulnerable biological system, in one’s DNA, the most precious building blocks of life that define your very existence.

After a preprogrammed strand of mRNA has merged with a naturally severed part of your DNA, it will request the production of a protein that should help trigger your immune system. In theory, this should boost your immune system and aid in the mass production of the proteins necessary to successfully fight the specific illness. The inserted messenger-RNA (thus, mRNA) should be relatively easy to design and programme as long as the scientists involved have the genetic coding for the infection it is to fight. In this case, the necessary data was released in January 2020 by the Chinese. Mild side effects to this process should be expected.

Although no extreme side effects were reported by Pfizer during the stage 3 testing of their mRNA vaccine, nearly every participant suffered mild symptoms, including swelling of the arm, irritation of the skin, and headaches, to name just a few. But, as we shall see, the information that Pfizer releases about its clinical trials and what happens in reality can be quite different.

I have just described the basic information you require for understanding how the coming mRNA vaccine works, but what I can’t describe to you is what happens in the long term. This form of therapeutic alternative has never been allowed or sanctioned before, aside from small clinical trials. There has never been an FDA-approved clinical trial for mRNA medicine because its usage comes with an abundance of ethical and moral questions and unknown possibilities.

At the same time, the utilisation of the mRNA method could also be one of the biggest leaps forward in technology ever recorded in human history. If we give the technology the benefit of the doubt and assume that it has no negative long-term side effects, then it is a potential treatment for almost every human illness on earth. Opening this mRNA floodgate would mean normalising regular vaccinations for nearly every imaginable ailment. In the best-case scenario, you could be vaccinated against cancer, heart disease, diabetes, dementia and Alzheimer’s, and any other human ailment that derives from a fault in your DNA. In the worst-case scenario, you could be left dead or crippled like Pfizer’s victims in its experiments on Nigerian children during the late 1990s.

All that being said, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine has a major downside to it. Pfizer and Moderna have stated that their mRNA vaccines need to be kept at -70° C and -20° C, respectively, which is a significant logistical challenge. Without these extremely cold temperatures, the mRNA and combined nanoparticles will lose their integrity. There are no studies on the effect of poorly stored mRNA vaccines on the human body. In comparison, DNA vaccines are much easier to transport and store as they are much more stable molecules.

As we have seen, the potential for mRNA technology is boundless. If the vaccine is successful in normalising the process of gene editing for medicinal benefit, there will be pressure to continue editing genes in other ways. It isn’t hard to see that the technology could have cosmetic, medical, and military applications that could range from phosphorescent skin to military bioweapons beyond our imagination. That is the reason why the people behind this technology are reluctant to speak about its potential game-changing mRNA method, for it represents our first real steps into transhumanism.

Pfizer’s Profitable Partnership with Germany’s BioNTech

As we have seen, Pfizer wasn’t the primary company in the mRNA business at the turn of 2020, but its immediate partnership with BioNTech saw it beat its main competitor, Moderna, to the finish line. BioNTech, based in Mainz, Germany, is led by a husband and wife team and, prior to the partnership with Pfizer, was dedicated to mRNA-related cancer-treatment research.

Uğur Şahin and Özlem Türeci, the couple leading BioNTech, are of Turkish descent. Şahin’s family were from southern Turkey, and he studied for his doctorate in Cologne, whilst Türeci’s family came from Istanbul. The two met at the University of Hamburg.

BioNTech already had a collaboration agreement to develop mRNA‐based vaccines for prevention of influenza with Pfizer as far back as February 2019, and their commercial strategy of collaborating with selected partners paid off when the race to the coronavirus vaccine began. Since then, there has been global media interest in BioNTech, mainly in the form of puff pieces focussing on Şahin and Türeci’s romantic life. But BioNTech also has many links to other Big Pharma giants and some of the well-known movers and shakers in the medical world. As well as its partnership with Pfizer, in 2019 BioNTech also had partnership deals with Bayer, Genentech, Sanofi, Genmab, Eli Lilly, Roche, and of course they received funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In September 2019, just before the first people were infected with the new strain of SARS-CoV-2, the German news outlet Handelsblatt reported that ‘the Gates Foundation is investing around 50 million euros in the Mainz biotech company BioNTech. The money will be used to research HIV and tuberculosis vaccines’.

BioNTech has a small five-person management team and a four-person supervisory board. Şahin is the CEO of the company; he was also the head of the scientific advisory board of Ganymed Pharmaceuticals AG from 2008 until 2016, when the company was acquired by Astellas Pharma. BioNTech’s chief business officer, Sean Marett, previously worked in global strategic and regional marketing, and in sales at GlaxoSmithKline in the United States and at Pfizer Europe, as well as for Evotec and Lorantis. The company’s chief operating officer and CFO, Dr Sierk Poetting, joined BioNTech in September 2014 from Novartis. The chief strategy officer at BioNTech is Ryan Richardson, who had previously been an executive director of the global health-care investment-banking team at J. P. Morgan in London, where he advised companies in the biotech and life sciences industry on mergers and acquisitions, equity, and debt capital finances. The German BioNTech’s four-man supervisory board includes Ulrich Wandschneider, who is also a member of Trilantic Europe.

Pfizer: A Company Never Held to Account

If it were only BioNTech that was responsible for the creation of this futuristic vaccine technology, then maybe people would have more faith in the product. But Pfizer casts a dark shadow of conspiracy wherever it does business. Pfizer’s previous use of experimental drugs in secretive and scandalous studies has inspired Hollywood movies and court cases lasting over a decade, as it resulted in the death of many children. Yet, the media organisations touting its coronavirus vaccine as a heaven-sent miracle have provided little to no coverage of Pfizer’s previous experimental disasters.

Pfizer entered into the vaccine business in late 2006 by acquiring the British influenza-vaccine company PowderMed for an undisclosed fee. Pfizer was admittedly excited about the deal, stating that ‘PowderMed’s unique DNA vaccine technology is particularly promising’ and that ‘its pipeline of vaccine candidates for influenza and chronic viral diseases could have major potential’. In fact, beginning in autumn 2005, many Big Pharma companies had taken their first steps into the vaccine industry. Novartis entered the vaccine business by acquiring 56 percent of Chiron, whilst GlaxoSmithKline expanded its vaccine base by acquiring ID Biomedical of Canada. Competition was heating up among the big players, and the vaccine industry was seen as a safe bet, with reports of new vaccines selling for hundreds of dollars. But Pfizer’s reputation over the preceding decade had taken a severe knock due to the company’s disastrous experimental trials in Africa.

In 1996, an experimental trial took place in Nigeria. Under the cover of severe outbreaks of cholera, measles, and meningitis in northern Nigeria, Pfizer set up the secretive trials in Kano, the second largest city in Nigeria, to test its experimental antibiotic, Trovan (trovafloxacin). It tested the experimental drug on two hundred children. The children’s parents assumed that the children would receive the standard meningitis jab, but Pfizer staff instead set up two control groups. Half of the children were given the experimental Trovan, and the other hundred were given a reduced dosage of the leading meningitis equivalent. The lower dose was to help artificially skew the results in the favour of Trovan for marketing and competitive purposes.

In 2002, a group of Nigerian children and their legal guardians sued Pfizer in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. In court documents, the plaintiffs alleged that five children who received Trovan and six children whom Pfizer had ‘low-dosed’ had died as a result, whilst others suffered paralysis, deafness and blindness. The alleged actual number of those who died due to their involvement in the trial, per Nigerian sources, is over fifty.

Pfizer was supposed to check the children’s blood samples five days into the trials to look for any abnormalities and then change their treatment to the full-strength leading meningitis drug if there were any problems. However, they failed to do so. Instead, the Pfizer team waited for the irreversible symptoms to manifest physically before switching the treatment for the study’s unwitting participants. After realising that they had just murdered and crippled these children, Pfizer, like any giant pharmaceutical corporation would, left the scene of the crime in a hurry, failing to do any further evaluation of the patients.

Pfizer spent the next ten years denying any responsibility for the disaster, eventually releasing a statement entitled ‘Trovan, Kano State Civil Case—Statement of Defense’, in which the pharmaceutical bigwig stated among other things ‘that mortality in the patients treated by Pfizer was lower than that observed historically in African meningitis epidemics, and that no unusual side effects, unrelated to meningitis, were observed after 4 weeks’.

Pfizer eventually settled the case for $75 million on condition that it would not be held responsible for its actions. The Guardian newspaper reported in 2011 that the first four settlements in the lengthy court battle had been given to the families of four of the children who were killed during the trial. In an unabashed attempt to make the court settlement of $175,000 harder for each of the surviving families to claim, the victims’ families were forced to provide DNA samples to prove they were actually related to the deceased. This tactic turned out to be very effective from the company’s perspective, as many of the families didn’t trust Pfizer, which led some to pull out and refuse the settlement because they thought the DNA samples were a ploy by Pfizer to commit further illegal secret experiments upon them, or worse.

The Nigerians were represented by two brave lawyers, a Nigerian lawyer named Etigwe Uwo and a Connecticut-based lawyer, Richard Altschuler. According to Altschuler, it was the story of Pfizer’s Kano coverup that prompted John le Carré to write the novel The Constant Gardener that was adapted in the feature film. Like the situation depicted in the movie, Pfizer used scare tactics and smear campaigns to try and hinder any investigation into the Kano incident.

In 2006, Pfizer cut its workforce by 20 percent, reducing the number of its US employees by 2,200 people. The Financial Times reported on 29 November 2020 that this was something that was happening in all of the major pharmaceutical firms stating, ‘Big pharma is rushing to restructure across its business from manufacturing to how it markets and sells its drugs’. But Pfizer was mainly concentrating on radical change to its drugs salesforce.

Pfizer was hit by further major scandals over the following year. One included the illegal premarketing of the HIV drug Maraviroc, which initially stalled the drug’s approval by the FDA. The scandal saw Pfizer publicly fire three of its top executives, including its assistant sales manager, Kelly Fitzgerald, (who returned to work for Pfizer and is currently their assistant sales director), HIV sales director, Art Rodriguez, now working for California’s Valued Trust, and the Mid-Atlantic director, Bob Mumford.

Get Your Facts Straight and Another Way Out

Whilst a DNA vaccine will change your DNA permanently, an mRNA vaccine will not permanently change your DNA. It takes one sentence to clear up that misunderstanding of the technology, and people should not be criminalised for such a simple misunderstanding. However, the mRNA vaccine does bind with part of your DNA to alter the proteins being produced. This is the very place where companies wish to trap opponents of their experimental vaccine campaigns. Just because someone doesn’t fully understand the process involved shouldn’t mean they should be demonised and forced into taking this experimental combination of nanoparticles. In fact, individuals should reject the vaccine until companies explain how it works and if there are any long-term side effects. You shouldn’t let anybody put anything into your body until they can tell you if any long-term consequences could occur. This is a basic principle of self-preservation that trumps any risk of a virus, especially a virus that has proven to be just a little bit more deadly than the common flu.

Our bodies should be the most important concern for us all. Fundamentally speaking, all our liberties and freedoms are of little concern if we’re dead or crippled. Don’t let them shame you into giving over your precious and delicate shell to medical scientific experimentation by companies that are incapable of taking accountability for their actions. This is the core argument that you need to keep at the forefront of any debate, rather than whether your DNA is permanently changed or whether its functions are just altered. If you’re going to get into the gutter to battle out the science then you must get your facts straight. They will use any potential misunderstanding you have to wipe your voice from the debate. It is they who bear the burden of articulating clearly why we should take the vaccine; it is your right to refuse.

However, there is something no one has mentioned so far about this new mRNA technology that could give those who oppose the vaccine another way out. Normally, to be effective, a vaccine must be given to as much of the population as possible. Mass vaccination has been used historically as a synthetic herd immunity to stop the spread of a virus to the vulnerable people in our society. But this technology is different, and its method of working means it is no longer necessary to use mass vaccination.

The whole point of why mRNA vaccines are more effective than our current vaccine technologies, per its proponents, is that it precisely targets the protein-production part of your DNA’s normal life cycle. This improves the response that an individual’s immune system will have when fighting a virus. It can be targeted socially in a similar way. If the majority of people who catch Covid-19 are asymptomatic, then it’s ridiculous to give them a vaccine. Because this vaccine protects individuals in their response, there is no good reason why everybody in our society should be forced to take it. It is used to increase specific protein production in someone who’s at severe risk—that’s how a medicine works normally. You don’t take HIV medication if you don’t have HIV. You shouldn’t be taking cancer drugs unless you have cancer. And you shouldn’t need to change your DNA’s production of specific proteins unless it’s personally necessary to do so.

The biggest lie being told to the people of the world is that everybody needs to take this vaccine. And ironically, the experimental mRNA technology that they’re desperate to use makes mass vaccination unnecessary.

  1. Can you possibly explain why the vaccine must be given in two fairly widely spread shots/appointments? I can’t find this information anywhere.

    1. One of many questions these vaccine makers should be REQUIRED to answer before applying for FDA approval. One factor I would guess is that exposure to this virus does not induce lasting antibodies. But what about an immune response we can’t see or detect?
      They withhold vital information because it hurts their chances of getting approved – this is obvious. Once approved, they will claim they were concerned about vaccine hesitancy but the reality is only the fearful, misinformed, and uninformed are excited about these vaccines. Here is a link to the Pfizer trial. You can search for any trial on the website. A lot of confusing jargon but all I needed to see was that this study is estimated to be completed in 2023. Why are these jabs currently being shipped on planes and sitting in hospitals? Horrendous. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728?term=pfizer&cond=Covid19&draw=2&rank=1

    2. It is a delicate balance between an “adequate” immune response and “hyper” or inflammatory immune response. One strategy is to give two smaller doses. Though its impossible to find a one-dose-fits-all for vaccines considering health conditions, body weight, age, genetic variance, and individual immune characteristics.

  2. Great article. There are some potential positives to mRNA vaccines but we need more research into the long-term consequences before I will be comfortable getting one.

  3. You write: “…that part of your DNA, after breaking in two through a natural process, will then be combined with the experimental mRNA…” This is WRONG!! That’s the mechanism for a DNA vaccine, NOT mRNA! . mRNA (messenger RNA) is the RNA produced by the transcription of a specific DNA gene leading the to production of a specific mRNA which then leaves the cell nucleus, arrives in the cellular cytoplasm and is hooked up to ribosomes (the cellular organelle that reads the mRNA like a blueprint and attaches the specific amino acids which comprise the specified protein molecule). With an mRNA vaccine, the mRNA is introduced by injection rather than being made by transcription in the cell’s nucleus.

    mRNA vaccines do not affect the DNA inside the cell [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA_vaccine#Mechanism]!

    1. There are multiple studies that show that RNA can enter from the cytoplasm back into the nucleus. There are also studies that show RNA’s ability to alter DNA (including a good one from January of this year.)

      NIH reference on RNA. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072778/
      RNA effect on DNA. https://phys.org/news/2020-01-rna-effect-dna.html

      I understand mRNA is one of four types of RNA. We do not have any long term studies on the ability of this particular mRNA and it’s ability to pass the gateways in the nucleus.

      FYI – you’re better off not referencing wikipedia. They have a history of inaccuracies. You’re better off referencing the scientific articles that prove or disprove a point. I have yet to see any that disprove the ability of any of these current mRNA vaccines from passing from the cytoplasm into the nucleus.

    2. Hi Rael, I admit I was mildly concerned that a Welsh musician was writing the piece. I’m an Australian living in UK with no scientific qualifications. That said, I have grave concerns about the fact the incumbent government is merrily rolling out a mass vaccination program over here after only a few months of clinical trials (none of which appear to have been published in peer-reviewed journals – I could be wrong, but haven’t found any to date). I want to get back home at some point and Australian airlines are already touting mandatory vaccination to fly…. You seem to know a thing or two. Any thoughts on the potential problems with the vaccine? I’d appreciate the input. Thanks, Michelle from cold, miserable, rainy Reading.

  4. Johnny Vedmore,
    Terrible article!
    You have already fallen for the bottom lie: that there is such a thing as “virus”. If you accept that, all is lost.
    Look up Dr. Stefan Lanka’s “Misunderstanding the virus”

    1. Agreed. In particular, there is absolutely no electromicroscopic photograph of any isolated purified virus anywhere; see this page, for example:
      Everyone should take notice that all controlled opposition gives credit, whether explicitly or implicitly, to the existence of so-called ‘Covid-19’ and more generally of alleged ‘pathogenic viruses’ in general; but the fundamental lie is germ theory itself.
      Here is another interesting document by the late David Crowe on the specific case of so-called ‘Covid-19’ and how testing is meaningless (I would disagree with him on calling Robert Koch ‘great’, but that is a detail):

  5. Fact check: protein synthesis, by mRNA occurs in the cytoplasm of your cells . But your genetic code / DNA is locked up in your cell nucleus. The 2 do not contact each other. You have fundamentally misunderstood cell biology. Your entire interpretation of how mRNA works is wrong. 🙁

    1. Fact Check:
      mRNA binding proteins are able to enter from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. These binding proteins actually have the ability to turn on and off areas within the nucleus, acting as a ‘switch’ to alter the regulation of biological mechanisms. (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150225142444.htm)

      Your understanding of mRNA appears to be limited or outdated. This field is advancing quickly, and we are still not fully aware of all the capabilities and implications.

  6. There is a typo in “reported on 29 November 2020”, the year should be 2006!

    Nevertheless, this is an excellent article – as always providing the much needed facts about the past and present atrocities of the Big Pharma.

  7. A basic understanding of molecular biology is lacking in this article. Arguments MUST be based on facts. This article is smeared all over with poor logic. I feel sorry for myself for having wasted my time. Sheesh….

  8. mRNA doesn’t change your DNA nor does it bind to your DNA. DNA is transcribed in the nucleus into RNA and the RNA is translated outside the nucleus in the ribosome. This is where the vaccine mRNA is also translated. Your DNA in the nucleus of the cell does not factor into the process at all.

  9. After retweeting, I received a comment that mRna does not enter the nucleus of the cell and therefore cannot attach to or affect the DNA. Thoughts?

  10. Good article, Johnny, but I’m afraid you have missed a very key element in this whole issue, evident by this statement here: “…the inserted messenger-RNA (thus, mRNA) should be relatively easy to design and programme as long as the scientists involved have the genetic coding for the infection it is to fight. In this case, the necessary data was released in January 2020 by the Chinese.”

    Intending to specifically address the very same issue you have delved into here, I did an intensive bit of mNRA vaccine research yesterday that led me to also study up on cell biology to better understand how these vaccines are meant to work, and I’d say you did a pretty good job at that. But I also zeroed in on the point above as being crucial to understanding the fraud being perpetrated with these vaccines. I’ll quote from my piece written yesterday:

    However, despite the claims that the ‘covid19’ virus has been isolated and genetically sequenced, neither is true, as I’ll document in a continuing comment. As you can see above, ALL of these mRNA vaccines ostensibly rely on protein sequences specific to ‘SARS Covid-19’, but that is simply not possible if they have not isolated and gene sequenced the virus!

    Furthermore, like all other organisms native to earth, all viruses have portions of their gene sequence that are shared with other organisms, including other viruses, which points to one of several ‘potential side effects’ alluded to in that first pro vaccine presentation above, restated as “the mRNA strand in the vaccine may elicit an unintended immune reaction…”

    Here’s a quote from the research purporting to have isolated and sequenced the covid virus:

    “The virus was called nCoV-2019 BetaCoV/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 and grew in Vero E6 (grivet, or African green monkey kidney cell line which lack genes to encode type I interferon, so they mount a defective antiviral response) and Huh-7 (human adult liver cancer-derived cell line) cells. Virus-induced cellular changes (cytopathic effect or CPE) were observed.

    Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to identify the unique genetic sequence of the cultured virus and a specific real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-rPCR) designed to allow screening of more sensitive and rapid screening of more samples. The RT-rPCR was tested against human endemic CoVs (229E, OC43, HKU1) as well as MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and others, and was found to be highly specific for SARS-CoV-2. (note what they say below that bit in the article regarding the methodology used to arrive at this purported gene sequencing, their reference to the Jukes-Cantor model)

    Here is another view of that Jukes-Cantor ‘gene sequencing’ process:

    “Dr Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.

    The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”

    He then goes on to say this about their ‘isolation’ of the purported covid virus:

    “The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:

    “Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.”

    What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible “hosts” or models on which they can test. The first is humans. Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus. The second possible host is animals. Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals, they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus. Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2, in an experiment that used mice. The researchers found that none of the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur. They experienced nothing like the illness called Covid 19.

    The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.

    The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.

    My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings.” https://www.drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/?fbclid=IwAR0Fmx5gczHOkdA8_iKHWVifGdzxM8f_02g0sXtHQIHyyzyZVJ8sV1VY0iE

    1. Interesting. What is your explanation for all of the new respiratory symptoms in patients not seen before now? I’m genuinely curious.

    2. Well, there is a viral coronavirus that is highly transmissible between humans and causes hyper immune response (cytokine storm) in a small percentage of those infected. However, it might be that the strain used in the research paper is not the exact strain causing the disease called COVID-19 in humans. Or, severe COVID-19 (which is really a hyper immune response) may be an “antibody dependent reaction” or “immune enhancement” in individuals whom were previously exposed to certain other coronavirus antigens in the wild or in flu vaccines. Could also be immune dysfunction suppression related to vitamin D, C, melatonin or other nutrient deficiency. Such are the complexities of human health and disease. I wish the experts would be honest about what they don’t really know.

    3. Is there a possible connection here to the far lower infection rate, of whatever this is, in people with O negative blood? No “monkey genes”?

  11. What is the point of arguing about efficacy of the vaccine when the whole epidemiological field has never proved the causation between an infectious agent and a certain disease? The 4 sound and logical Koch’s postulates have never been satisfied with ANY bacteria or virus(for viruses there are newer and easier postulates from Milton Rivers which also have never been satisfied). Why even go to that argumentation when they have never experimentally proven that viruses or bacteria even cause disease? Books i reccomend to read to learn more on that topic:
    The Contagion Myth – Thomas Cowan
    The Invisible Rainbow – Arthur Firstenberg

  12. You missed out the most important part. And that is the vaccine contains hydrogel which can be controlled by 5G.

    Yes, your body will then be controlled by the government. It can kill you when it believes you have no further use.

  13. Very interesting article and informative comments.
    Here’s a question I have yet to find an answer to.
    I have looked on the net and seen many pages where they use the title ’10 essential questions answered about the vaccine,’ and pages where they claim to inform us about the essential things we need to know but no one asks this question.
    Why it’s so hard to find the truth of this is beyond me. It it not the most important thing we need to know.?

  14. “The biggest lie being told to the people of the world is that everybody needs to take this vaccine.”

    Reminds me of the quote from ‘The Usual Suspects’: “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn’t exist”

  15. Excellent article. Thanks! One thing though is this : “You don’t take HIV medication if you don’t have HIV.” Actually there is a very popular and effective combination HIV-drug called Truvada ( tenofovir disoproxil and emtricitabine) that is used for PrEP in high-risk individuals. It is used as part of a cocktail (ie, Truvada + Isentress or Truvada + Tivicay) normally (in somebody who is HIV + or as part of PEP – Post Exposure Prophylaxis) but in a person who is using it for PrEP it is used by itself. “PrEP is one of a number of HIV prevention strategies for people who are HIV negative but who also have higher risk of acquiring HIV, including sexually active adults at increased risk of HIV, people who engage in injection drug use (see drug injection), and serodiscordant sexually active couples.” Two other drugs are also used for this same purpose (both are used alone, but, they to, are combination medicines): tenofovir disoproxil and lamivudine (Cimduo) and emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (Descovy).

  16. You need to abandon longtime compromised Wiki as a source… and study Aristotle’s Logic instead…
    How exactly do you suggest changing your DNA to produce Purported Foreign Deadly Virus Proteins which will thereby stimulate what’s left of our quaxine addled immune systems to fight Purported Foreign Deadly Virus Proteins is some kind of unexplainable miracle process that will cure every malaise from cancer to ingrown toenails without genocidal effects, without revealing your utter insanity???

    It’s very simple to describe: Every Human who is victimized becomes a Deadly Virus Factory and they can transmit this “gain of function” to offspring – and since the delivery process is virus in virus, it can spread via shedding etc.

    Unfortunately, the thousands of Quaxine-brained imbeciles who sacrificed themselves or their children on Bill Gates’ Demonic Alter, are harbingers of complete Human Extinction, as the only way to stop it at this point would be complete Human Extermination which is the planned end goal of complete Human Quaxtermination…

    The absolute clarification the Human Race has long ago reached Herd Immunity without any Quaxine ‘help’ is the 94% falsely reported Covid19 CAUSED Mortality Rate / Total Human Population = 99.95% Herd Immunity. If you eliminate the 94% Bullshit counts, that current Worldwide Herd Immunity is increased to @ 99.99555%. In gutter bookie risk terms that would mean you’d probably have about a million more chances to win Super Lotto 52 wks in a row than to die from Covid19.

  17. I remember those Parental Advisory Stickers put on many rap and metal cds and others that had profanity and “explicit content” seems anything from Big Pharma should be like when we consume cigarettes have a warning label that says “Enter at your own risk”.

  18. AS a grandmother, all I can say is THANK YOU. Your carefully researched article should be manadory reading in every high school and university! I am not a scientist and I don’t care about the science behind how these new vac$$ines will work – or NOT work. I am more concerned about integrity, honesty and safety. and your article points out what I have always known – THESE NEW VACCINES ARE NOT ABOUT SAVING HUMANITY FROM A NEW OR IMAGINED VIRAL THREAT – THEY ARE ALL ABOUT MAKING BILLION$$ OF DOLLAR$$ FOR KORRUPT KILLER KORPORATATIONS. And I thank you for having the courage too share this truth widely!!! In solidarity & love – FOREVER Idle NO More!!! <3

  19. It is not an underestimation that the public has not been well informed with the abundantly available the independently peer reviewed reproducible evidence regarding mRNA vaccine approach. The pharmaceutical company claim whatever they want to claim but it needs to be reproduced by the independent public funded labs. I have three very basic questions regarding the mRNA delivery platform to elicit immune response against a viral spike protein.
    1) Where is the evidence that one’s muscle cells actually produce the spike proteins instructed via the injected mRNA?
    2) Where is the evidence that these spike proteins made by the human muscle cells can actually stimulate the circulating antibodies?
    3) Where is the evidence that these circulating antibodies can actually kill the virus that causes the disease?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts