9/11 and the Politics of Fear and Self-Preservation

We will either be remembered as a country that took freedom and liberty for all seriously or we will be remembered as a nation of cowards who, driven by fear, were willing to deprive this group, then that group, of their freedom — before losing that freedom entirely.

Originally published at MintPress News

The 20th anniversary of September 11, 2001 is a particularly somber one, not just because of the horrific nature of events of that day reaching its second-decade milestone, but because of how little we seem to have learned in that amount of time.

The fear and trauma generated by the events of 9/11 were used by the U.S. national security state and its civilian allies to great effect to divide the American population, to attack independent reporting as well as independent thought, to gut the anti-war movement, and to normalize the U.S. government’s overt and persistent degradation of the country’s Constitution. This, of course, is in addition to the illegal U.S. occupations and drone wars in the Middle East and elsewhere that were also born out of this event.

The true beneficiaries of 9/11

As a nation, the U.S. populace has failed to grapple with these realities, and many others, in the two decades since the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 fell. Far from bringing any benefit to the alleged masterminds of the event, the results of 9/11 instead overwhelmingly favored the ambitions of a powerful faction within the U.S. national security state that had long sought to bring the dissident-elimination efforts it spent decades implementing abroad – from the Phoenix Program in Vietnam to Operation Condor in South America – home to roost.

As a result, the response of the U.S. government to the attack supposedly launched by those “who hate us for our freedom” was to work to reduce our freedoms and civil liberties. Now, 20 years on, the sophisticated “War on Terror” apparatus has been fully turned into a “War on Domestic Terror,” with many of those who once opposed the war on terrorism abroad now cheering on the ratcheting up of its domestic equivalent.

Yet, the domestic terror apparatus being swiftly created and implemented very clearly targets individuals and ideologies on both sides of the political divide. It is also extremely vague, essentially leaving it up to those holding the reins of political power – whether Democrat, Republican or something else – to decide who is “terrorist” and who is not. Perhaps unsurprisingly, it was Joe Biden back in the mid-1990s who introduced legislation that would have given the president sole and unappealable authority to define what constitutes “terrorism,” a fact that was omitted from media coverage of last year’s presidential campaign and the past several months of his presidency.

A crisis of courage

It seems clear at this point that one of the key reasons the U.S. continues to hemorrhage its remaining civil liberties, either as a result of the new “War on Domestic Terrorism” or as a response to COVID-19, is that it is undergoing a crisis of conscience and courage in grappling with not just the true nature of the events of 9/11 itself, but with the orthodoxy over the “official story” of those events.

Even two decades after the fact, it is still deemed too controversial or unthinkable to question whether the official story is an accurate portrayal of the events that transpired on and led to that day. This is despite the fact that the official story itself, presumably the same story told by the 9/11 Commission report, has been labeled incomplete, and unable to answer major questions about that day, by its very authors. In addition, the official story relies heavily on testimony obtained through extreme torture, meaning it is of questionable accuracy.

Many of those who have been quick and vocal to point out the lies of the U.S. government when it comes to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and other consequences of the War on Terror have been unable to even consider that the official story of 9/11 may not be legitimate and may indeed have been dealt from the same pack. This may be for a variety of reasons, including a strong desire to not be de-legitimized by their peers as bearers of the “conspiracy theorist” smear and an unwillingness to face a political reality where U.S. government officials may have been complicit in a deadly attack on American soil. In those two examples, however, the failure of such individuals, particularly in media, to even consider that there may be more to the story boils down to a desire for self-preservation in the case of the former and preservation of a particular worldview in the case of the latter. Yet, in both cases, the casualty is the truth and the cause is cowardice.

By failing as a society to thoroughly examine the events of 9/11 and why those events occurred, the American public has shown the powers that be that their desire to preserve a “safe” worldview — and to preserve their own careers, in the case of certain professional classes — is enough to keep people from questioning world-altering events when they emerge. Those powers are well aware of this refusal and have been using it to their advantage ever since.

The poison remains in our system

Today, with the COVID-19 crisis still dragging on, we are similarly immersed in a situation where nuance and facts are being cast aside, militantly in some cases, in favor of the establishment narrative. Is everyone who chooses not to take this particular vaccine a “conspiracy theorist” and “anti-vaxxer”? Does it really make sense to so dramatically divide the public into groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated through a new ID system when the vaccine claims to reduce the severity of illness but not to stop disease transmission? Should those that question the motivation of politicians, powerful pharmaceutical corporations and mainstream media “experts” be censored from expressing those views online?

You do not need to agree with those who hold such views, but what is wrong with hearing what they have to say and debating their evidence with your own? We are losing the ability to have rational public discourse about these issues — and losing it swiftly, at a speed comparable to what took place in the aftermath of 9/11, when questioning the motives of the Bush administration, U.S. intelligence agencies and other groups, as well as their proposed responses and “solutions,” was deemed “unpatriotic” and even “treasonous” by some. Calls were made to strip an entire class of Americans of their freedom for merely sharing the same ethno-religious identities as those we were told attacked us, and many went along with it. Freedom became treated as a privilege only for certain groups, not as a right, and this insidious fallacy has reared its head yet again in recent months in relation to the COVID-19 vaccine debate and also the war on domestic terror.

Our pandemic of fear

Though the failure to consider explanations for 9/11 that deviate from the official story can be called cowardice, the most enduring lesson 20 years on from 9/11 is perhaps that fear was and remains the most powerful tool that has been consistently used to whittle down our freedom and civil liberties. While the divide-and-conquer strategies have raged on from 9/11 to the present, the largest wealth transfers in history have occurred, creating an unaccountable and ultra-wealthy super-elite that dominates an ever-growing underclass.

The march towards this de facto neo-feudalism certainly didn’t begin on or after 9/11, but our collective failure to grapple with the narrative orthodoxies of that day have prevented us from fully understanding the big picture of that event as well as many subsequent and similarly consequential events. For too long, the desire to preserve our self-image, our reputation, and the worldview we are taught in school has all too often made hard, difficult truths a casualty.

In order to truly understand the War on Terror, the domestic surveillance state and our current reality, we must accept that we were lied to about 9/11. We must ask the hard questions and accept hard truths. We must put an end to the 20-plus-year-long pandemic of fear over “invisible enemies,” fear that has pushed us to surrender the very freedoms that we are told we are protecting.

The United States, and much of the world, is quickly becoming an unrecognizable and authoritarian dystopia. We cannot wait another two decades to grapple with the difficult questions and realities that arose after 9/11 and persist into the present. We will either be remembered as a country that took freedom and liberty for all seriously or we will be remembered as a nation of cowards who, driven by fear, were willing to deprive this group, then that group, of their freedom — before losing that freedom entirely.

Feature photo | Associated Press

  1. The ‘Carabinieros’ of Chile- an etymology which traces back to the very Feudal policing, military caste which was the origin of the Italian Mafia, the Carbonari. It became the ‘The Mafia’ later, after its associations with Freemasonry and International Fascism, through Giuseppe Mazzini- associations which it has used a ton of leverage to suppress through Hollywood and glamorized PR/Media Coverage.

  2. Excellent analysis
    COVID-19 is an opportunity for those consumers of ALL MAINSTREAM NEWS to SEE. Forget Trump and the “narrative matrix” (Caitlin Johnstone) you grew up in,..lived in ALL YOUR LIFE. One can easily see the 24 hr. Corporate-aproved gov’t sponsored lies spoken daily..and then realize it’s all been a psychological operation to subdue the people of the middle and lower classes. FURTHER, it’s been a COMPLETE SCAM! The ORGANIZED CRIME OUR GOVERNMENT engages in is THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY. FIGHT..UNITE

  3. I have spent quite a bit of time studying 9/11. It is impossible to believe the official narrative if one cares to look for the truth. Yet, many of family, friends and associates refuse to listen to anything that contradicts that description. The same mental model of manipulation is used for covid. Unfortunately, we never learn from the past.

  4. Well-written article. I came across this site while looking for information on the author of the upcoming book, “One Nation Under Blackmail.” From what I see here, I will be pre-ordering that book now.

  5. https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/
    Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, Ph.D., independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at
    GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
    https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2021-09-18/debate-leaky-vaccines/ (Dr. Malone interview with Jimmy Dore link is in there)

    The interactions between the immune system and the vaccines are complex and if you want the Health Department to educate and inform us, I am convinced that it will not be going to happen. In addition, it is more difficult to make an informed decision when sound scientific information is more difficult to reach to us. I just wanted to share the links.

  6. Any examination of the “true nature of the events of 9/11” needs to account for the extremely counterproductive official narrative of the 911 Truth movement. When the first plane struck the first WTC building, the administration had their “new Pearl Harbor.” The second building provided additional justification/pretext. Both buildings were effectively destroyed, no need to drop them. Building 7 added nothing to the “new Pearl Harbor” justification. Anyone who thinks that these buildings were brought down by a controlled demolition has engaged in extremely biased, muddled thinking. The technical difficulties are overwhelming. Why bother and risk exposure? As for the “missile not an airplane” striking the Pentagon, this is roughly equivalent to those claiming Sandy Hook was a staged hoax. The net effect of all of this is to taint objective reality by associating/conflating it with demonstrably bizarre theories. Also, to divert attention from important things toward an endless search for nano-thermite residue. The “911 Truth” movement which came to be dominated by Lyndon LaRouchies was instrumental in gutting what little was left of the anti-war movement. You would do well to avoid association with them.

    1. Building 7 didn’t just fall over from getting hit by some debris. It was clearly brought down, which raises a lot of other questions. I agree that maybe its more productive to stay focused on foreknowledge and the revelations brought to light by Bob Graham about Saudi intelligence and FBI infiltration of Atta’s cell. But building 7 is indisputably bizarre, and raises questions that are worth looking into.

    2. You’ve not examined the evidence, have you?

      A commercial passenger jet cannot pull such high-G manoeuvres without causing fuselage to beak up & pilots to black out.

      It cannot fly low across lawn without scorching the grass.

      It cannot disintegrate on impact leaving not one drop of blood or fuel, not one strip of luggage or upholstery, not one piece of engine or tyre, not one scrap of human remains.

      It cannot leave a 16ft-wide hole in the building, a hole surrounded by offices in which paper remained undisturbed but no evidence of wing, tail or engine impact.

      It cannot and did not fly into the Pentagon.

      Physics, innit.

  7. Whitney is a beacon of light in a sea of darkness. My resistance recommendation is to boycott all national elections in the USA and thus de-legitimize the already illegitimate government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Read More

COVID-19: Moderna Gets Its Miracle

COVID-19 erased the regulatory and trial-related hurdles that Moderna could never surmount before. Yet, how did Moderna know that COVID-19 would create those conditions months before anyone else, and why did they later claim that their vaccine being tested in NIH trials was different than their commercial candidate?
Read More

SDG16: Part 2 — Enforcing Digital Identity

The United Nations claims that the purpose of Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG16) is to promote peaceful and inclusive societies and to provide access to justice for all. Hiding behind the rhetoric is the real objective: to strengthen and consolidate the power and authority of the "global governance regime" and to exploit threats—both real and imagined—in order to advance regime hegemony. In Part 2, Iain and Whitney examine the centrality of Digital ID (SDG 16.9) in this endeavour.